Invalid value '0' for parameter userid in method vB_Api_User::fetchProfileInfo . The discussion of which Nut is better than the other has been up for debate time and again by guitarists the world over. So, in other words, Tusq is denser and more consistent that bone. First fit a Tusq saddle and nut and the sound was better with the urea to my ears. Using either Tusq or bone varies from guitar to guitar. To contact the forum owner hit the Contact Us link. Bone is the traditional choice of material for acoustic guitar nuts. However, Tusq can also be processed to imitate the structure and color of the bone nut. as long as the stock nut does what it's intended to do, there isn't any reason to change it. I've heard the tusq is the way to go, but I would like some opinions on that. Bone Nuts VS TUSQ Nuts. Shooz Matthews says it's so. Still, bone has proven its worth over the years. Now install a bone nut and listen again. TUSQ is by far the best nut to use and I will explain. You can change your guitar nut from bone to Tusq and vice versa, and check which is better for you. Nut Types. It does what a nut is supposed to do. Itâs hard, dense, and light material that offers incredible resonance and better sustain when properly installed. Discussion in 'Tech-Talk' started by liquoragent511, Aug 29, 2009. Ivory and bone are inconsistent and have hard and soft spots which hamper consistent transfer of vibrations to the guitar top. >> Unbleached Bone Nuts. Based on the specifications, Tusq and bone nuts are the same in terms of sustain, volume, and resonance. This article will reveal everything about Tusq nut vs bone. Guitar nut seems to be a tiny little thing thatâs just there to elevate the strings. Discussion in 'Hardware, Setup & Repair [BG]' started by cazclocker, Jun 17, 2015. Like any nut material, the bone and Tusq nuts have advantages and drawbacks. Couldn't agree more - 2 of mine have bone- the other three have Tusq. Tusq nuts are injection-molded plastic, but a hard plastic which transfers the string vibrations better than the cheap plastic nuts found on low-end guitars do. But bone is warmer and has a more traditional tone. As far as I can tell there really isn't a big difference in changing the nut, and I'll usually just leave the nut unless the nut is broken or a very poor hollowed out plastic nut. Which is better? Is the stock nut just as good? Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. For instance, these Squier CVs. Density will affect durability. Any bone can be used for the nut, for as long as itâs dense and works well. I replaced the Tusq nut and saddle on my 814C and noted a very subtle change. About This Item. Stock nut next to the installed Colosi nut. Tusq XL nuts on the other hand are self lubricating, so offer improved tuning stability without having any maintenance. However, this will not always the case as the guitar sound doesnât only depend on the nut, but a lot of other factors. There isnât much difference in terms of sound, unless you have a very trained ear. TUSQ is simply more efficient at transferring vibrations to your guitar top, resulting in big open lows and cle I have a '98 MIM that was rather dark/overly warm sounding. It's as good as most, bone or otherwise. Collapse. [/sesameStreet] with a bone nut, a Tusq nut, and an "ordinary plastic" nut, no question that the "ordinary plastic" would be odd man out. Bridge Pin, Nut, and Saddle comparison: Liquidmetal, Tusq, Ebony, Bone, Plastic Sweetwater did a very interesting comparison of the effect of various materials on tone. Through this precise engineering, they are found to have better sustain, more volume and more consistent and effective than bone. Since itâs consistent, there are no dead spots or flats and is a very rigid material. For more modern strat that's made up of more alder planks that help deaden the tone, the Tusq will brighten considerably. So, I would say it depends on the guitar. If you want to know if your guitar nut is a bone or a Tusq, this YouTube video shows two very simple techniques on how to identify the nut material: Although itâs hard to determine the effect of the nut material on the overall sound of the guitar, some say that Tusq offers a brighter tone compared to bone. ). Some claim a dramatic improvement in both tone and sustain. The most common type is the standard nut that’s found on the majority of guitars at every price point. But, you rarely think about the nut. Joined: Feb 13, 2014 Location: Omaha, Ne. Anyways, there are a few advantages and disadvantages for both Tusq and a bone nut. The TUSQ vs Bone debate is extremely debated about on mlp and other forums.So bear with me if you get frustrated.. They play a big part in distinguishing tone quality during play. Then I try bone again, which I generally prefer. Nothing is as sexy as a well-polished bone nut. Most Fender guitars come from the factory with cyclovac (simulated or composite bone). And, as the âking of nuts,â it offers a well-balanced tone, especially on open strings. When buying a new guitar, you might consider the tonewood, the neck, the strings, the pickups, the bridge, and the headstock. Tusq was an experiment I definitely won't repeat on the 160. Since bone is an organic material, it can have soft spots and the density throughout the material is inconsistent. When comparing plastic and a bone, itâs clear that the bone will dominate. Materials used to make them can vary from bone or brass all the way to ‘high tech’ plastics such as corian, micarta, and TUSQ. It offers remarkable strength against mechanical shocks and itâs very reliable especially when lubricated. As the most popular and probably the best material for nut construction, the bone nut is widely installed on high-end guitars. They're inexpensive and qualify for the 'synthetic' category. The maker of Tusq will tell you that bone, being natural, is subject to air pockets or something like that which CAN make them inconsistent from string to string if that ever happens to you. _____ Like any nut material, the bone and Tusq nuts have advantages and drawbacks. However, recently, the cow bone or American buffalo bone is more preferred, specifically on the femur and humerus bones or from the pelvis or tibia. My only data point on nut materials is the original plastic (worn slots) vs a replacement bone nut in my strat. I used Bob Colossi bone and upgraded the tuners to Gotoh's. Bone Nut Vs. High tech Tusq? Any sugestions would be great. Guitars, whether electric or acoustic, are made of different parts. I have a tusq nut on my Godin. I've been thinking about replacing the nut on my MIM Strat. The thinking is that if you take two nuts of equal hardness but different weights, they will sound different. It's way more important that the nut is made properly,not what it's made of,unless the material is absolute crap.I changed from a Tusk nut,a hard material, to a graphite nut, a somewhat softer material and there was absolutely no change in tone.Don't believe the voodoo that some people spout. The tusq nut and saddle on my DN4 looked ratty after just a few months. Now, regarding the TUSQ material: to my understanding, there are two types of TUSQ, the TUSQ and the TUSQ XL, but only the latter is impregnated with Teflon and is advertised as having self-lubricating properties. The most common and probably the best guitar nuts are those that are made of bone and fossil ivory (this is banned). Except for the newest (bone) and the oldest (Tusq), I've heard the other three with both and have chosen bone for one and Tusq for the other two. Overall, Tusq nut vs bone argument offers a lot more information to everyone. However, Tusq material quickly gains popularity and challenged the position of the bone material to be the best guitar nut. Exactly.People put way to much importance on what the nut is made of.Bone,ivory,Tusk,Corian,Cyclovac,they're all similar. Those nuts gotta go. Any sugestions would be great. Since they are made from organic, real bones, there may be some inconsistencies and dead spots. -- Bob R Just tried replacing the urea nut and saddle on my new Yamaha GC12 Classical. So now I'm worried that, in a blind test, I couldn't tell the difference between Tusq and bone, and I've just been deluding myself. But, it has a crucial part as it controls the spacing of the strings, the distance from the edge of the fretboard and the height of the strings on the first fret. Age: … Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next ... One of the cosmetics I deal with fairly early on is the nut. So, what you should do is try and compare. liquoragent511, Aug 29, 2009 #1. It is an all solid Kala Acacia tenor. Bone or Tusq saddle/nut vs ebony So I've got this solid uke that I posted about last week. Extra slippery: TUSQ XL ® is impregnated with Teflon ® (500% more slippery than graphite). Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > Feb 23, 2014 #1. rexgranite TDPRI Member. + They have more consistent density throughout the material, – Has thinner response, though they claim to have better bass response, + Great when working on string relief, angling and slotting, + Self-lubricates and keeps the string in proper tuning and pitch, – Inconsistent density and may have dead spots since it varies from the source. If you want to change the nut of your guitar, you should know that itâs a bit expensive, especially if youâll ask a luthier to do it. if it ain't broke..... (You must log in or sign up to reply here. Tusq is a good material and comes stock on many higher end guitars, but I actually prefer Graph-tec Graphite nuts over the Tusq. However, Tusq is not just any plastic. TUSQ gives better tone performance, richer tone and much more sustain. Guitar nuts are a very important piece of a guitar. I've done numerous for the same reason you cited. While the difference between the two isn’t as pronounced as going from a cheap plastic nut to a bone or Tusq nut, there are definitely some advantages with Tusq. The problem with the lip balm is that it doesn't last as much as the strings, hence the desire for a new nut. Last Tusq nut I bought was $7.00. Then switched to bone and the improvement was far better than either the urea or Tusq. I seem to recall at least one forum member saying he reverted to Tusq. Asian-made guitars have nuts from water buffalo or camel. I've heard the tusq is the way to go, but I would like some opinions on that. Bone is also naturally very hard and won’t wear down like plastic. Use boxwood pins to soften it a little more. (If you’re feeling scientific, record the guitar’s sound to compare later.) Are there any advantages in replacing the nut with bone or tusq? Tusq is very nice in that it is slicker than bone and allows the strings to slide around more so it's easier to tune the guitar and they tend to stay in tune longer. So, though itâs small, itâs has a very important role which canât be replaced by anything. Some players want to stick to a bone nut, while others want to try this modern nut material. FYI, Tusq will render a brittle sound as compared to other materials. Fossil Ivory: Finally we come to fossil ivory. Are there any advantages in replacing the nut with bone or tusq? Some players want to stick to a bone nut, while others want to try this modern nut material. Posts: 3. Replaced with Tusq and sounds light years better. The newest and oldest sound fine … Descriptions of the tonal change when replacing the nut and saddle from bone to Tusq range from subtle to fantastic. Though Tusq is technically plastic, yet through its high-precision process, it offers a consistent and uniform slab or nut. I'm not asking which is better than the other.. You donât need to change anything about your nut if you find it perfect for your guitar. The exception are the vintage reissue and custom shop models which come with genuine bone. In terms of appearance, they are identical. All bone nuts are carved from scratch to fit the guitar. Thatâll depend on the player. My dealer installed a Colosi bone nut and saddle. So I want to upgrade my plastic nut to a bone or tusq nut..just like other threads I don't see this thread finding a single conclusion.. To my ears at least, the bone nut and saddle when fit properly improve sound dramatically. With this, they deliver a rich tone and crystal clear bell-like high-end response. Tusq Nut vs Bone: Advantages and Disadvantages. Got the action right but never happy with the sound. Tusq saddles and nuts are actually made from an extremely high-quality polymer, formed by high levels of heat and pressure, which allows them to transfer string energy and sustain more consistently and efficiently. I find Tusq to be a little brighter and slicker for tremolo. once a note is fretted, however, it makes no difference what the nut is made of, it's out of the equation. Taylor puts bone nuts and saddles on the 9 series. I then made a new saddle out of a bone blank from Stewart McDonald and the original tone came roaring back. Guitar makers and players agree...acoustic guitars come alive with TUSQ man-made ivory. During tremolo bends, the strings slide in the slots, returning to accurate pitch. Sounds a bit better and looks a LOT better. Leave the nut and change out the saddle to micarta. For a vintage strat, go with bone. I often do this until a new guitar begins to open up and start to sound richer. I have a thing about that. TUSQ - Nuts TUSQ DELIVERS THE OPTIMUM FREQUENCIES FROM THE STRINGS TO THE GUITAR TOP, PRODUCING RICHER AND FULLER TONE. Is the stock nut just as good? Frankly I think that's a real stretch, even if theoretically true. Some people prefer the tone of fossil ivory over bone – but again others swear by bone. Graph Tech also makes a “TUSQ derivative” they call NuBone. Bone saddle and pins with my new Taylor 314CE. As people say just make sure its cut and installed properly. Let’s look at the different nut types in our graphite vs plastic vs bone nuts challenge and see what the differences are between them. TUSQ vs. TUSQ XL vs. Nubone vs. Micarta nuts...help! Tusq Nut vs Bone Nut Discussion in 'Telecaster Discussion Forum' started by rexgranite, Feb 23, 2014. Plastic nuts are the most common by far. This is the brand name for an alternate man-made material that is often used today in place of traditional bone or ivory for acoustic guitar saddles and nuts. Plastic. Self-lubricating nuts from Graph Tech are ideal for string bending and tremolo work. So, letâs compare their similarities and differences in terms of performance, looks, and overall tonality. Remember, the nut material only has a tiny effect on the overall sound, but it has a very important role in your guitar. May 10, 2012 . A brand name for an alternative guitar nut material, Tusq attempts to replace bone as the best nut for acoustic guitars. Try your own comparison: play a guitar with a plastic nut long enough to get to know its tone and sustain. So, to help you understand everything about guitar nut, letâs begin with the Tusq Nut vs Bone argument. Tusq Nut vs Bone: Which Will Be Hailed as The Best Guitar Nut? Tonal Differences. Some guitars are better with Tusq nut, while others are awesome with the traditional nut material. I think tusq is a definite step down I managed to shave too much off my stock bone saddle on my BR160 and replaced it with tusq. Both are excellent materials for nut construction. Since bone nuts are natural, they look sexy and retains the color of the bone itâs taken from. It is strung with Aquila strings and has an ebony saddle and nut. The bone brings your guitar to life with a better attack and sustain. In fact, renowned guitar makers like Taylor, Gibson, and Tacoma are now using Tusq nuts and saddles. Compensated Nut Tusq Nut vs Bone: Similarities and Differences, Tusq Nut vs Bone: Advantages and Disadvantages. If it isn't bone, I replace it with bone. I made a comparison video for a Tusq vs. I really like it but it is not very loud compared to other ukes at the jam and even my tenor laminated uke. Bone is my first choice but cutting a bone nut is a very labor intensive process and you really need to take your time and get it right. Strat-Talk.com is an independent, member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation. The guitar plays well and sounds good, but I haven't compared it to another nut. The nuts are made of different materials, including bone, fossil ivory, plastic (including Corian, Micarta, and Tusq), metal, graphite, brass, and ebony. Will the bone nut material remains the best or will Tusq be a good alternative? AllroyPA LeftyStrategist. Stock bridge and pins next to the installed Colosi bridge and pins. They are made of high-quality polymer molder under high levels of pressure and heat to mimic or even exceed the qualities of bone nut. I have found that the tone — when compared to bone and synthetic bone — is thinner using TUSQ nuts, even though they market a better bass response. TUSQ nuts boast “permanent lubrication” and definitely deliver in the self–lubrication category, being easy to shape.
Importance Of Name In History Taking, What Animals Live In Seagrass Meadows, Apple Brie Sandwich, Vornado Fan 660, Franz Donuts Near Me, Makita Dlm382z Review, Graco Blossom 6-in-1 High Chair, Studio,